Kodak S2400M or Xtorm XP2W300: which should you choose?
Comparison of the two portable power stations using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.
Kodak S2400M
Main drawbackDemanding loads and conversion losses shorten usable runtime
Read the full analysis →
Xtorm XP2W300
Main drawbackCapacity limited to 204 Wh, for phones, a lamp, and a computer
Read the full analysis →Our verdict based on your priority
- Priority: “Rated power”Kodak S2400M 8.8 / 10 vs 6.9
- Priority: “Battery capacity”Kodak S2400M 8.9 / 10 vs 6.8
- Priority: “Equipment”Xtorm XP2W300 9 / 10 vs 8.2
By criterion
| Criterion | Kodak S2400M | Xtorm XP2W300 |
|---|---|---|
| Rated power | 8.8 advantage | 6.9 |
| Battery capacity | 8.9 advantage | 6.8 |
| Equipment | 8.2 | 9 advantage |
A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.
Side-by-side specs
| Specification | Kodak S2400M | Xtorm XP2W300 |
|---|---|---|
| Rated power | 2400 W | 300 W |
| Battery capacity | 2047,5 Wh | 204 Wh |
| Weight | Not provided | 3,65 kg |
| Mains charging time | Not provided | 1,5 h |
| Maximum solar input power | 1200 W | 120 W |
| Total power of included solar panels | Not provided | 0 W |
| Solar | Solar charging compatible | Solar charging compatible |
| Use | Home backup | Motorhome |
| Non-USB DC outputs | DC5521 socket | 12 V cigarette lighter socket |
| App connectivity | Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Battery technology | Not disclosed | LiFePO4 |
Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, compiled in our reviews. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.
Which is right for you?
Kodak S2400M
Leads on 2 criteria of 3 compared
- Battery capacity: 8.9/10 vs 6.8/10 (2047,5 Wh vs 204 Wh)
- Rated power: 8.8/10 vs 6.9/10 (2400 W vs 300 W)
Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →
Frequently asked questions
Which is rated higher, Kodak S2400M or Xtorm XP2W300?
Kodak S2400M scores 8.6/10, compared with 8/10 for Xtorm XP2W300, using the same scoring criteria.
Which wins on “Battery capacity”?
Kodak S2400M wins on “Battery capacity”: 8.9/10 compared with 6.8/10 for Xtorm XP2W300. Recorded values: 2047,5 Wh versus 204 Wh.
Which wins on “Rated power”?
Kodak S2400M wins on “Rated power”: 8.8/10 compared with 6.9/10 for Xtorm XP2W300. Recorded values: 2400 W versus 300 W.
Which wins on “Equipment”?
Xtorm XP2W300 wins on “Equipment”: 9/10 compared with 8.2/10 for Kodak S2400M.