Head to head

AFERIY P310 or Kodak S2400M: which should you choose?

Comparison of the two portable power stations using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.

AFERIY P310, studio product shot

AFERIY P310

8.8/10
Overall rating

Main drawbackA heavy lift when loading it into a vehicle

Check price on Amazon → Read the full analysis →
Kodak S2400M, studio product shot

Kodak S2400M

8.6/10
Overall rating

Main drawbackDemanding loads and conversion losses shorten usable runtime

Read the full analysis →

Our verdict based on your priority

  • Priority: “Rated power”AFERIY P310 9.4 / 10 vs 8.7
  • Priority: “Battery capacity”AFERIY P310 9.4 / 10 vs 8.8
  • Priority: “Equipment”AFERIY P310 9.5 / 10 vs 8.2

By criterion

Comparison of AFERIY P310 and Kodak S2400M by criterion
Criterion AFERIY P310 Kodak S2400M
Rated power 9.4 advantage 8.7
Battery capacity 9.4 advantage 8.8
Equipment 9.5 advantage 8.2

A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.

Side-by-side specs

Specifications for AFERIY P310 and Kodak S2400M
SpecificationAFERIY P310Kodak S2400M
Rated power3600 W2400 W
Battery capacity3840 Wh2047,5 Wh
Weight42 kgNot provided
Maximum solar input power2000 W1200 W
Number of 230 V sockets3 socketsNot provided
SolarSolar charging compatibleSolar charging compatible
UseMotorhomeHome backup
Expansion batteryCompatible with an expansion batteryCompatible with an expansion battery
Battery technologyLiFePO4Not disclosed
Non-USB DC outputs12 V cigarette lighter socketDC5521 socket
App connectivityWi-FiWi-Fi

Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, compiled in our reviews. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.

Which is right for you?

AFERIY P310

Leads on 3 criteria of 3 compared

  • Equipment: 9.5/10 vs 8.2/10
  • Rated power: 9.4/10 vs 8.7/10 (3600 W vs 2400 W)
  • Battery capacity: 9.4/10 vs 8.8/10 (3840 Wh vs 2047,5 Wh)
View AFERIY P310 →

Kodak S2400M

Leads on 0 criterion of 3 compared

  • No numerical specification sets it apart in this comparison.
View Kodak S2400M →
Kodak S2400MNo verified partner offers for this modelRead the full analysis

As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →

Frequently asked questions

Which is rated higher, AFERIY P310 or Kodak S2400M?

They're neck and neck: 8.8/10 for AFERIY P310, 8.6/10 for Kodak S2400M. A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage.

Which wins on “Equipment”?

AFERIY P310 wins on “Equipment”: 9.5/10 compared with 8.2/10 for Kodak S2400M.

Which wins on “Rated power”?

AFERIY P310 wins on “Rated power”: 9.4/10 compared with 8.7/10 for Kodak S2400M. Recorded values: 3600 W versus 2400 W.

Which wins on “Battery capacity”?

AFERIY P310 wins on “Battery capacity”: 9.4/10 compared with 8.8/10 for Kodak S2400M. Recorded values: 3840 Wh versus 2047,5 Wh.

More useful comparisons

Spotted an error on this page? Report it