GENERGY GZE-3036-PRO-S or Kodak S2400M: which should you choose?
Comparison of the two portable power stations using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.
GENERGY GZE-3036-PRO-S
Main drawbackConsumption and conversion losses shorten usable runtime
Read the full analysis →
Kodak S2400M
Main drawbackDemanding loads and conversion losses shorten usable runtime
Read the full analysis →Our verdict based on your priority
- Priority: “Rated power”GENERGY GZE-3036-PRO-S 9.4 / 10 vs 8.7
- Priority: “Equipment”Kodak S2400M 8.2 / 10 vs 7.5
By criterion
| Criterion | GENERGY GZE-3036-PRO-S | Kodak S2400M |
|---|---|---|
| Rated power | 9.4 advantage | 8.7 |
| Battery capacity | 9.2 | 8.8 |
| Equipment | 7.5 | 8.2 advantage |
A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.
Side-by-side specs
| Specification | GENERGY GZE-3036-PRO-S | Kodak S2400M |
|---|---|---|
| Rated power | 3600 W | 2400 W |
| Battery capacity | 3072 Wh | 2047,5 Wh |
| Maximum solar input power | Not provided | 1200 W |
| Solar | Solar charging compatible | Solar charging compatible |
| Use | Home backup | Home backup |
| Expansion battery | Compatible with an expansion battery | Compatible with an expansion battery |
| Battery technology | LiFePO4 | Not disclosed |
Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, compiled in our reviews. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.
Which is right for you?
GENERGY GZE-3036-PRO-S
Tied, leading on 1 of the 3 criteria compared
- Rated power: 9.4/10 vs 8.7/10 (3600 W vs 2400 W)
Kodak S2400M
Tied, leading on 1 of the 3 criteria compared
- Equipment: 8.2/10 vs 7.5/10
Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →
Frequently asked questions
Which is rated higher, GENERGY GZE-3036-PRO-S or Kodak S2400M?
They're neck and neck: 8.7/10 for GENERGY GZE-3036-PRO-S, 8.6/10 for Kodak S2400M. A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage.
Which wins on “Rated power”?
GENERGY GZE-3036-PRO-S wins on “Rated power”: 9.4/10 compared with 8.7/10 for Kodak S2400M. Recorded values: 3600 W versus 2400 W.
Which wins on “Equipment”?
Kodak S2400M wins on “Equipment”: 8.2/10 compared with 7.5/10 for GENERGY GZE-3036-PRO-S.