Head to head

EcoFlow DELTA 2 or Kodak S2400M: which should you choose?

Comparison of the two portable power stations using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.

EcoFlow DELTA 2, studio product shot

EcoFlow DELTA 2

8.5/10
Overall rating

Main drawbackStored energy is limited for prolonged use with heavy electrical loads

Read the full analysis →
Kodak S2400M, studio product shot

Kodak S2400M

8.6/10
Overall rating

Main drawbackDemanding loads and conversion losses shorten usable runtime

Read the full analysis →

Our verdict based on your priority

  • Priority: “Rated power”Kodak S2400M 8.7 / 10 vs 7.9
  • Priority: “Battery capacity”Kodak S2400M 8.8 / 10 vs 7.8
  • Priority: “Equipment”EcoFlow DELTA 2 9.5 / 10 vs 8.2

By criterion

Comparison of EcoFlow DELTA 2 and Kodak S2400M by criterion
Criterion EcoFlow DELTA 2 Kodak S2400M
Rated power 7.9 8.7 advantage
Battery capacity 7.8 8.8 advantage
Equipment 9.5 advantage 8.2

A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.

Side-by-side specs

Specifications for EcoFlow DELTA 2 and Kodak S2400M
SpecificationEcoFlow DELTA 2Kodak S2400M
Rated power1800 W2400 W
Battery capacity1024 Wh2047,5 Wh
Weight12 kgNot provided
Maximum solar input power500 W1200 W
Number of 230 V sockets4 socketsNot provided
SolarSolar charging compatibleSolar charging compatible
UseMotorhomeHome backup
Expansion batteryCompatible with an expansion batteryCompatible with an expansion battery
Battery technologyLiFePO4Not disclosed
Non-USB DC outputs12 V cigarette lighter socketDC5521 socket
App connectivityBluetoothWi-Fi

Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, compiled in our reviews. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.

Which is right for you?

EcoFlow DELTA 2

Leads on 1 criterion of 3 compared

  • Equipment: 9.5/10 vs 8.2/10
View EcoFlow DELTA 2 →

Kodak S2400M

Leads on 2 criteria of 3 compared

  • Battery capacity: 8.8/10 vs 7.8/10 (2047,5 Wh vs 1024 Wh)
  • Rated power: 8.7/10 vs 7.9/10 (2400 W vs 1800 W)
View Kodak S2400M →

Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →

Frequently asked questions

Which is rated higher, EcoFlow DELTA 2 or Kodak S2400M?

They're neck and neck: 8.5/10 for EcoFlow DELTA 2, 8.6/10 for Kodak S2400M. A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage.

Which wins on “Equipment”?

EcoFlow DELTA 2 wins on “Equipment”: 9.5/10 compared with 8.2/10 for Kodak S2400M.

Which wins on “Battery capacity”?

Kodak S2400M wins on “Battery capacity”: 8.8/10 compared with 7.8/10 for EcoFlow DELTA 2. Recorded values: 2047,5 Wh versus 1024 Wh.

Which wins on “Rated power”?

Kodak S2400M wins on “Rated power”: 8.7/10 compared with 7.9/10 for EcoFlow DELTA 2. Recorded values: 2400 W versus 1800 W.

More useful comparisons

Spotted an error on this page? Report it