Kodak S2400M or VEVOR M6 600 W 493 Wh: which should you choose?
Comparison of the two portable power stations using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.
Kodak S2400M
Main drawbackDemanding loads and conversion losses shorten usable runtime
Read the full analysis →
VEVOR M6 600 W 493 Wh
Main drawback7.5 h mains charging makes sudden departures awkward
Read the full analysis →Our verdict based on your priority
- Priority: “Rated power”Kodak S2400M 8.8 / 10 vs 7.3
- Priority: “Battery capacity”Kodak S2400M 8.8 / 10 vs 7.1
By criterion
| Criterion | Kodak S2400M | VEVOR M6 600 W 493 Wh |
|---|---|---|
| Rated power | 8.8 advantage | 7.3 |
| Battery capacity | 8.8 advantage | 7.1 |
| Equipment | 8.2 | 8.2 |
A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.
Side-by-side specs
| Specification | Kodak S2400M | VEVOR M6 600 W 493 Wh |
|---|---|---|
| Rated power | 2400 W | 600 W |
| Battery capacity | 2047,5 Wh | 493 Wh |
| Weight | Not provided | 5,80 kg |
| Mains charging time | Not provided | 7,5 h |
| Maximum solar input power | 1200 W | 100 W |
| Number of 230 V sockets | Not provided | Not specified (unverified) |
| Solar | Solar charging compatible | Solar charging compatible |
| Use | Home backup | Motorhome |
| Non-USB DC outputs | DC5521 socket | 12 V cigarette lighter socket |
| Battery technology | Not disclosed | LiFePO4 |
Values taken from the specifications table in each analysis; “Not provided”: no value found. “unverified”: among the 5 essential specifications (Rated power, Battery capacity, Weight, Number of 230 V sockets, Mains charging time), a value found online that no verified source (archived retailer page or manufacturer documentation) confirms. Other rows are not subject to this check.
Which is right for you?
Kodak S2400M
Leads on 2 criteria of 3 compared
- Battery capacity: 8.8/10 vs 7.1/10 (2047,5 Wh vs 493 Wh)
- Rated power: 8.8/10 vs 7.3/10 (2400 W vs 600 W)
VEVOR M6 600 W 493 Wh
Leads on 0 criterion of 3 compared
- No numerical specification sets it apart in this comparison.
Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →
Frequently asked questions
Which is rated higher, Kodak S2400M or VEVOR M6 600 W 493 Wh?
Kodak S2400M scores 8.6/10, compared with 7.9/10 for VEVOR M6 600 W 493 Wh, using the same scoring criteria.
Which wins on “Battery capacity”?
Kodak S2400M wins on “Battery capacity”: 8.8/10 compared with 7.1/10 for VEVOR M6 600 W 493 Wh. Recorded values: 2047,5 Wh versus 493 Wh.
Which wins on “Rated power”?
Kodak S2400M wins on “Rated power”: 8.8/10 compared with 7.3/10 for VEVOR M6 600 W 493 Wh. Recorded values: 2400 W versus 600 W.