Head to head

Kodak S2400M or SWAREY S1000: which should you choose?

Comparison of the two portable power stations using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.

Kodak S2400M, studio product shot

Kodak S2400M

8.6/10
Overall rating

Main drawbackDemanding loads and conversion losses shorten usable runtime

Read the full analysis →
SWAREY S1000, studio product shot

SWAREY S1000

7.7/10
Overall rating

Main drawbackModest solar input leaves little headroom to replenish the battery

Read the full analysis →

Our verdict based on your priority

  • Priority: “Rated power”Kodak S2400M 8.7 / 10 vs 7.5
  • Priority: “Battery capacity”Kodak S2400M 8.8 / 10 vs 7.4
  • Priority: “Equipment”Kodak S2400M 8.2 / 10 vs 7

By criterion

Comparison of Kodak S2400M and SWAREY S1000 by criterion
Criterion Kodak S2400M SWAREY S1000
Rated power 8.7 advantage 7.5
Battery capacity 8.8 advantage 7.4
Equipment 8.2 advantage 7

A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.

Side-by-side specs

Specifications for Kodak S2400M and SWAREY S1000
SpecificationKodak S2400MSWAREY S1000
Rated power2400 W1000 W
Battery capacity2047,5 Wh725 Wh
WeightNot provided6 kg
Mains charging timeNot providedNot disclosed (unverified)
Maximum solar input power1200 W126 W
SolarSolar charging compatibleSolar charging compatible
Charging methodsMains, solar, car, generatorMains, vehicle, solar

Values taken from the specifications table in each analysis; “Not provided”: no value found. “unverified”: among the 5 essential specifications (Rated power, Battery capacity, Weight, Number of 230 V sockets, Mains charging time), a value found online that no verified source (archived retailer page or manufacturer documentation) confirms. Other rows are not subject to this check.

Which is right for you?

Kodak S2400M

Leads on 3 criteria of 3 compared

  • Battery capacity: 8.8/10 vs 7.4/10 (2047,5 Wh vs 725 Wh)
  • Rated power: 8.7/10 vs 7.5/10 (2400 W vs 1000 W)
  • Equipment: 8.2/10 vs 7/10
View Kodak S2400M →

SWAREY S1000

Leads on 0 criterion of 3 compared

  • No numerical specification sets it apart in this comparison.
View SWAREY S1000 →

Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →

Frequently asked questions

Which is rated higher, Kodak S2400M or SWAREY S1000?

Kodak S2400M scores 8.6/10, compared with 7.7/10 for SWAREY S1000, using the same scoring criteria.

Which wins on “Battery capacity”?

Kodak S2400M wins on “Battery capacity”: 8.8/10 compared with 7.4/10 for SWAREY S1000. Recorded values: 2047,5 Wh versus 725 Wh.

Which wins on “Rated power”?

Kodak S2400M wins on “Rated power”: 8.7/10 compared with 7.5/10 for SWAREY S1000. Recorded values: 2400 W versus 1000 W.

Which wins on “Equipment”?

Kodak S2400M wins on “Equipment”: 8.2/10 compared with 7/10 for SWAREY S1000.

More useful comparisons

Spotted an error on this page? Report it