Kodak S2400M or FlashFish E200: which should you choose?
Comparison of the two portable power stations using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.
Kodak S2400M
Main drawbackDemanding loads and conversion losses shorten usable runtime
Read the full analysis →
FlashFish E200
Main drawbackLimited stored energy means choosing which devices get priority
Read the full analysis →Our verdict based on your priority
- Priority: “Rated power”Kodak S2400M 8.7 / 10 vs 6.8
- Priority: “Battery capacity”Kodak S2400M 8.8 / 10 vs 6.6
- Priority: “Equipment”Kodak S2400M 8.2 / 10 vs 7
By criterion
| Criterion | Kodak S2400M | FlashFish E200 |
|---|---|---|
| Rated power | 8.7 advantage | 6.8 |
| Battery capacity | 8.8 advantage | 6.6 |
| Equipment | 8.2 advantage | 7 |
A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.
Side-by-side specs
| Specification | Kodak S2400M | FlashFish E200 |
|---|---|---|
| Rated power | 2400 W | 200 W |
| Battery capacity | 2047,5 Wh | 151 Wh |
| Weight | Not provided | 1,85 kg |
| Mains charging time | Not provided | Not disclosed |
| Maximum solar input power | 1200 W | 40 W |
| Number of 230 V sockets | Not provided | 1 sockets |
| Solar | Solar charging compatible | Solar charging compatible |
| Charging methods | Mains, solar, car, generator | Mains, car, solar |
Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, compiled in our reviews. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.
Which is right for you?
Kodak S2400M
Leads on 3 criteria of 3 compared
- Battery capacity: 8.8/10 vs 6.6/10 (2047,5 Wh vs 151 Wh)
- Rated power: 8.7/10 vs 6.8/10 (2400 W vs 200 W)
- Equipment: 8.2/10 vs 7/10
FlashFish E200
Leads on 0 criterion of 3 compared
- No numerical specification sets it apart in this comparison.
Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →
Frequently asked questions
Which is rated higher, Kodak S2400M or FlashFish E200?
Kodak S2400M scores 8.6/10, compared with 7.2/10 for FlashFish E200, using the same scoring criteria.
Which wins on “Battery capacity”?
Kodak S2400M wins on “Battery capacity”: 8.8/10 compared with 6.6/10 for FlashFish E200. Recorded values: 2047,5 Wh versus 151 Wh.
Which wins on “Rated power”?
Kodak S2400M wins on “Rated power”: 8.7/10 compared with 6.8/10 for FlashFish E200. Recorded values: 2400 W versus 200 W.
Which wins on “Equipment”?
Kodak S2400M wins on “Equipment”: 8.2/10 compared with 7/10 for FlashFish E200.