Ampace Andes 1500 or Kodak S2400M: which should you choose?
Comparison of the two portable power stations using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.
Ampace Andes 1500
Main drawbackShorter runtime as consumption increases
Read the full analysis →
Kodak S2400M
Main drawbackDemanding loads and conversion losses shorten usable runtime
Read the full analysis →Our verdict based on your priority
- Priority: “Battery capacity”Kodak S2400M 8.8 / 10 vs 8.3
- Priority: “Equipment”Kodak S2400M 8.2 / 10 vs 6.6
By criterion
| Criterion | Ampace Andes 1500 | Kodak S2400M |
|---|---|---|
| Rated power | 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Battery capacity | 8.3 | 8.8 advantage |
| Equipment | 6.6 | 8.2 advantage |
A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.
Side-by-side specs
| Specification | Ampace Andes 1500 | Kodak S2400M |
|---|---|---|
| Rated power | 2400 W | 2400 W |
| Battery capacity | 1462 Wh | 2047,5 Wh |
| Maximum solar input power | Not provided | 1200 W |
| Use | Home backup | Home backup |
| Battery technology | LiFePO4 | Not disclosed |
| Expansion battery | Compatibility not specified | Compatible with an expansion battery |
Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, compiled in our reviews. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.
Which is right for you?
Ampace Andes 1500
Leads on 0 criterion of 3 compared
- No numerical specification sets it apart in this comparison.
Kodak S2400M
Leads on 2 criteria of 3 compared
- Equipment: 8.2/10 vs 6.6/10
- Battery capacity: 8.8/10 vs 8.3/10 (2047,5 Wh vs 1462 Wh)
Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →
Frequently asked questions
Which is rated higher, Ampace Andes 1500 or Kodak S2400M?
Kodak S2400M scores 8.6/10, compared with 7.9/10 for Ampace Andes 1500, using the same scoring criteria.
Which wins on “Equipment”?
Kodak S2400M wins on “Equipment”: 8.2/10 compared with 6.6/10 for Ampace Andes 1500.
Which wins on “Battery capacity”?
Kodak S2400M wins on “Battery capacity”: 8.8/10 compared with 8.3/10 for Ampace Andes 1500. Recorded values: 2047,5 Wh versus 1462 Wh.