Ampace Andes 1500 or GENERGY GZE-3036-PRO-S: which should you choose?
Comparison of the two portable power stations using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.
Ampace Andes 1500
Main drawbackShorter runtime as consumption increases
Read the full analysis →
GENERGY GZE-3036-PRO-S
Main drawbackConsumption and conversion losses shorten usable runtime
Read the full analysis →Our verdict based on your priority
- Priority: “Rated power”GENERGY GZE-3036-PRO-S 9.4 / 10 vs 8.7
- Priority: “Battery capacity”GENERGY GZE-3036-PRO-S 9.2 / 10 vs 8.3
- Priority: “Equipment”GENERGY GZE-3036-PRO-S 7.5 / 10 vs 6.6
By criterion
| Criterion | Ampace Andes 1500 | GENERGY GZE-3036-PRO-S |
|---|---|---|
| Rated power | 8.7 | 9.4 advantage |
| Battery capacity | 8.3 | 9.2 advantage |
| Equipment | 6.6 | 7.5 advantage |
A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.
Side-by-side specs
| Specification | Ampace Andes 1500 | GENERGY GZE-3036-PRO-S |
|---|---|---|
| Rated power | 2400 W | 3600 W |
| Battery capacity | 1462 Wh | 3072 Wh |
| Use | Home backup | Home backup |
| Battery technology | LiFePO4 | LiFePO4 |
| Mains charging | Duration not specified | Duration not specified |
| Maximum solar input | Not specified | Not specified |
| Expansion battery | Compatibility not specified | Compatible with an expansion battery |
Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, compiled in our reviews. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.
Which is right for you?
Ampace Andes 1500
Leads on 0 criterion of 3 compared
- No numerical specification sets it apart in this comparison.
GENERGY GZE-3036-PRO-S
Leads on 3 criteria of 3 compared
- Equipment: 7.5/10 vs 6.6/10
- Battery capacity: 9.2/10 vs 8.3/10 (3072 Wh vs 1462 Wh)
- Rated power: 9.4/10 vs 8.7/10 (3600 W vs 2400 W)
Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →
Frequently asked questions
Which is rated higher, Ampace Andes 1500 or GENERGY GZE-3036-PRO-S?
GENERGY GZE-3036-PRO-S scores 8.7/10, compared with 7.9/10 for Ampace Andes 1500, using the same scoring criteria.
Which wins on “Equipment”?
GENERGY GZE-3036-PRO-S wins on “Equipment”: 7.5/10 compared with 6.6/10 for Ampace Andes 1500.
Which wins on “Battery capacity”?
GENERGY GZE-3036-PRO-S wins on “Battery capacity”: 9.2/10 compared with 8.3/10 for Ampace Andes 1500. Recorded values: 3072 Wh versus 1462 Wh.
Which wins on “Rated power”?
GENERGY GZE-3036-PRO-S wins on “Rated power”: 9.4/10 compared with 8.7/10 for Ampace Andes 1500. Recorded values: 3600 W versus 2400 W.