AFERIY P310 or Ampace Andes 1500: which should you choose?
Comparison of the two portable power stations using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.
AFERIY P310
Main drawbackA heavy lift when loading it into a vehicle
Check price on Amazon → Read the full analysis →
Ampace Andes 1500
Main drawbackShorter runtime as consumption increases
Read the full analysis →Our verdict based on your priority
- Priority: “Rated power”AFERIY P310 9.4 / 10 vs 8.7
- Priority: “Battery capacity”AFERIY P310 9.4 / 10 vs 8.3
- Priority: “Equipment”AFERIY P310 9.5 / 10 vs 6.6
By criterion
| Criterion | AFERIY P310 | Ampace Andes 1500 |
|---|---|---|
| Rated power | 9.4 advantage | 8.7 |
| Battery capacity | 9.4 advantage | 8.3 |
| Equipment | 9.5 advantage | 6.6 |
A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.
Side-by-side specs
| Specification | AFERIY P310 | Ampace Andes 1500 |
|---|---|---|
| Rated power | 3600 W | 2400 W |
| Battery capacity | 3840 Wh | 1462 Wh |
| Weight | 42 kg | Not provided |
| Maximum solar input power | 2000 W | Not provided |
| Number of 230 V sockets | 3 sockets | Not provided |
| Use | Motorhome | Home backup |
| Expansion battery | Compatible with an expansion battery | Compatibility not specified |
| Battery technology | LiFePO4 | LiFePO4 |
| Maximum solar input | 2 000 W, 12-160 V | Not specified |
Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, compiled in our reviews. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.
Which is right for you?
AFERIY P310
Leads on 3 criteria of 3 compared
- Equipment: 9.5/10 vs 6.6/10
- Battery capacity: 9.4/10 vs 8.3/10 (3840 Wh vs 1462 Wh)
- Rated power: 9.4/10 vs 8.7/10 (3600 W vs 2400 W)
Ampace Andes 1500
Leads on 0 criterion of 3 compared
- No numerical specification sets it apart in this comparison.
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →
Frequently asked questions
Which is rated higher, AFERIY P310 or Ampace Andes 1500?
AFERIY P310 scores 8.8/10, compared with 7.9/10 for Ampace Andes 1500, using the same scoring criteria.
Which wins on “Equipment”?
AFERIY P310 wins on “Equipment”: 9.5/10 compared with 6.6/10 for Ampace Andes 1500.
Which wins on “Battery capacity”?
AFERIY P310 wins on “Battery capacity”: 9.4/10 compared with 8.3/10 for Ampace Andes 1500. Recorded values: 3840 Wh versus 1462 Wh.
Which wins on “Rated power”?
AFERIY P310 wins on “Rated power”: 9.4/10 compared with 8.7/10 for Ampace Andes 1500. Recorded values: 3600 W versus 2400 W.