AFERIY P310 or Xtorm XP2W300: which should you choose?
Comparison of the two portable power stations using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.
AFERIY P310
Main drawbackA heavy lift when loading it into a vehicle
Check price on Amazon → Read the full analysis →
Xtorm XP2W300
Main drawbackCapacity limited to 204 Wh, for phones, a lamp, and a computer
Read the full analysis →Our verdict based on your priority
- Priority: “Rated power”AFERIY P310 9.5 / 10 vs 6.9
- Priority: “Battery capacity”AFERIY P310 9.5 / 10 vs 6.8
- Priority: “Weight”Xtorm XP2W300 9.2 / 10 vs 6.8
- Priority: “Equipment”AFERIY P310 9.5 / 10 vs 9
By criterion
| Criterion | AFERIY P310 | Xtorm XP2W300 |
|---|---|---|
| Rated power | 9.5 advantage | 6.9 |
| Battery capacity | 9.5 advantage | 6.8 |
| Weight | 6.8 | 9.2 advantage |
| Equipment | 9.5 advantage | 9 |
A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.
Side-by-side specs
| Specification | AFERIY P310 | Xtorm XP2W300 |
|---|---|---|
| Rated power | 3600 W | 300 W |
| Battery capacity | 3840 Wh | 204 Wh |
| Weight | 42 kg | 3,65 kg |
| Mains charging time | Not provided | 1,5 h |
| Maximum solar input power | 2000 W | 120 W |
| Total power of included solar panels | Not provided | 0 W |
| Number of 230 V sockets | 3 sockets | Not provided |
| Solar | Solar charging compatible | Solar charging compatible |
| Use | Motorhome | Motorhome |
| Battery technology | LiFePO4 | LiFePO4 |
| Non-USB DC outputs | 12 V cigarette lighter socket | 12 V cigarette lighter socket |
| App connectivity | Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Built-in transport features | Telescopic handle | Carrying handle |
| Car socket output | 12 V/10 A | 1 socket, 12 V, 100 W |
Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, compiled in our reviews. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.
Which is right for you?
AFERIY P310
Leads on 3 criteria of 4 compared
- Battery capacity: 9.5/10 vs 6.8/10 (3840 Wh vs 204 Wh)
- Rated power: 9.5/10 vs 6.9/10 (3600 W vs 300 W)
- Equipment: 9.5/10 vs 9/10
Xtorm XP2W300
Leads on 1 criterion of 4 compared
- Weight: 9.2/10 vs 6.8/10 (3,65 kg vs 42 kg)
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →
Frequently asked questions
Which is rated higher, AFERIY P310 or Xtorm XP2W300?
AFERIY P310 scores 8.8/10, compared with 8/10 for Xtorm XP2W300, using the same scoring criteria.
Which wins on “Battery capacity”?
AFERIY P310 wins on “Battery capacity”: 9.5/10 compared with 6.8/10 for Xtorm XP2W300. Recorded values: 3840 Wh versus 204 Wh.
Which wins on “Rated power”?
AFERIY P310 wins on “Rated power”: 9.5/10 compared with 6.9/10 for Xtorm XP2W300. Recorded values: 3600 W versus 300 W.
Which wins on “Weight”?
Xtorm XP2W300 wins on “Weight”: 9.2/10 compared with 6.8/10 for AFERIY P310. Recorded values: 3,65 kg versus 42 kg.
Which wins on “Equipment”?
AFERIY P310 wins on “Equipment”: 9.5/10 compared with 9/10 for Xtorm XP2W300.