AFERIY P310 or FlashFish E200: which should you choose?
Comparison of the two portable power stations using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.
AFERIY P310
Main drawbackA heavy lift when loading it into a vehicle
Check price on Amazon → Read the full analysis →
FlashFish E200
Main drawbackLimited stored energy means choosing which devices get priority
Read the full analysis →Our verdict based on your priority
- Priority: “Rated power”AFERIY P310 9.4 / 10 vs 6.8
- Priority: “Battery capacity”AFERIY P310 9.4 / 10 vs 6.6
- Priority: “Weight”FlashFish E200 9.3 / 10 vs 6.8
- Priority: “Number of 230 V sockets”AFERIY P310 8.7 / 10 vs 6.9
- Priority: “Equipment”AFERIY P310 9.5 / 10 vs 7
By criterion
| Criterion | AFERIY P310 | FlashFish E200 |
|---|---|---|
| Rated power | 9.4 advantage | 6.8 |
| Battery capacity | 9.4 advantage | 6.6 |
| Weight | 6.8 | 9.3 advantage |
| Number of 230 V sockets | 8.7 advantage | 6.9 |
| Equipment | 9.5 advantage | 7 |
A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.
Side-by-side specs
| Specification | AFERIY P310 | FlashFish E200 |
|---|---|---|
| Rated power | 3600 W | 200 W |
| Battery capacity | 3840 Wh | 151 Wh |
| Weight | 42 kg | 1,85 kg |
| Mains charging time | Not provided | Not disclosed |
| Maximum solar input power | 2000 W | 40 W |
| Number of 230 V sockets | 3 sockets | 1 sockets |
| Solar | Solar charging compatible | Solar charging compatible |
| Built-in transport features | Telescopic handle | Carrying handle |
| Maximum solar input | 2 000 W, 12-160 V | 40 W, XJM connection |
Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, compiled in our reviews. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.
Which is right for you?
AFERIY P310
Leads on 4 criteria of 5 compared
- Battery capacity: 9.4/10 vs 6.6/10 (3840 Wh vs 151 Wh)
- Rated power: 9.4/10 vs 6.8/10 (3600 W vs 200 W)
- Equipment: 9.5/10 vs 7/10
- Number of 230 V sockets: 8.7/10 vs 6.9/10 (3 sockets vs 1 sockets)
FlashFish E200
Leads on 1 criterion of 5 compared
- Weight: 9.3/10 vs 6.8/10 (1,85 kg vs 42 kg)
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →
Frequently asked questions
Which is rated higher, AFERIY P310 or FlashFish E200?
AFERIY P310 scores 8.8/10, compared with 7.2/10 for FlashFish E200, using the same scoring criteria.
Which wins on “Battery capacity”?
AFERIY P310 wins on “Battery capacity”: 9.4/10 compared with 6.6/10 for FlashFish E200. Recorded values: 3840 Wh versus 151 Wh.
Which wins on “Rated power”?
AFERIY P310 wins on “Rated power”: 9.4/10 compared with 6.8/10 for FlashFish E200. Recorded values: 3600 W versus 200 W.
Which wins on “Weight”?
FlashFish E200 wins on “Weight”: 9.3/10 compared with 6.8/10 for AFERIY P310. Recorded values: 1,85 kg versus 42 kg.
Which wins on “Equipment”?
AFERIY P310 wins on “Equipment”: 9.5/10 compared with 7/10 for FlashFish E200.
Which wins on “Number of 230 V sockets”?
AFERIY P310 wins on “Number of 230 V sockets”: 8.7/10 compared with 6.9/10 for FlashFish E200. Recorded values: 3 sockets versus 1 sockets.