GENERGY GZE-3036-PRO-S or Xtorm XP2W300: which should you choose?
Comparison of the two portable power stations using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.
GENERGY GZE-3036-PRO-S
Main drawbackConsumption and conversion losses shorten usable runtime
Read the full analysis →
Xtorm XP2W300
Main drawbackCapacity limited to 204 Wh, for phones, a lamp, and a computer
Read the full analysis →Our verdict based on your priority
- Priority: “Rated power”GENERGY GZE-3036-PRO-S 9.5 / 10 vs 6.9
- Priority: “Battery capacity”GENERGY GZE-3036-PRO-S 9.3 / 10 vs 6.8
- Priority: “Equipment”Xtorm XP2W300 9 / 10 vs 7.5
By criterion
| Criterion | GENERGY GZE-3036-PRO-S | Xtorm XP2W300 |
|---|---|---|
| Rated power | 9.5 advantage | 6.9 |
| Battery capacity | 9.3 advantage | 6.8 |
| Equipment | 7.5 | 9 advantage |
A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.
Side-by-side specs
| Specification | GENERGY GZE-3036-PRO-S | Xtorm XP2W300 |
|---|---|---|
| Rated power | 3600 W | 300 W |
| Battery capacity | 3072 Wh | 204 Wh |
| Weight | Not provided | 3,65 kg |
| Mains charging time | Not provided | 1,5 h |
| Maximum solar input power | Not provided | 120 W |
| Total power of included solar panels | Not provided | 0 W |
| Solar | Solar charging compatible | Solar charging compatible |
| Use | Home backup | Motorhome |
| Battery technology | LiFePO4 | LiFePO4 |
Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, compiled in our reviews. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.
Which is right for you?
GENERGY GZE-3036-PRO-S
Leads on 2 criteria of 3 compared
- Rated power: 9.5/10 vs 6.9/10 (3600 W vs 300 W)
- Battery capacity: 9.3/10 vs 6.8/10 (3072 Wh vs 204 Wh)
Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →
Frequently asked questions
Which is rated higher, GENERGY GZE-3036-PRO-S or Xtorm XP2W300?
GENERGY GZE-3036-PRO-S scores 8.8/10, compared with 8/10 for Xtorm XP2W300, using the same scoring criteria.
Which wins on “Rated power”?
GENERGY GZE-3036-PRO-S wins on “Rated power”: 9.5/10 compared with 6.9/10 for Xtorm XP2W300. Recorded values: 3600 W versus 300 W.
Which wins on “Battery capacity”?
GENERGY GZE-3036-PRO-S wins on “Battery capacity”: 9.3/10 compared with 6.8/10 for Xtorm XP2W300. Recorded values: 3072 Wh versus 204 Wh.
Which wins on “Equipment”?
Xtorm XP2W300 wins on “Equipment”: 9/10 compared with 7.5/10 for GENERGY GZE-3036-PRO-S.