GENERGY GZE-3036-PRO-S or FlashFish E200: which should you choose?
Comparison of the two portable power stations using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.
GENERGY GZE-3036-PRO-S
Main drawbackConsumption and conversion losses shorten usable runtime
Read the full analysis →
FlashFish E200
Main drawbackLimited stored energy means choosing which devices get priority
Read the full analysis →Our verdict based on your priority
- Priority: “Rated power”GENERGY GZE-3036-PRO-S 9.4 / 10 vs 6.8
- Priority: “Battery capacity”GENERGY GZE-3036-PRO-S 9.2 / 10 vs 6.6
- Priority: “Equipment”GENERGY GZE-3036-PRO-S 7.5 / 10 vs 7
By criterion
| Criterion | GENERGY GZE-3036-PRO-S | FlashFish E200 |
|---|---|---|
| Rated power | 9.4 advantage | 6.8 |
| Battery capacity | 9.2 advantage | 6.6 |
| Equipment | 7.5 advantage | 7 |
A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.
Side-by-side specs
| Specification | GENERGY GZE-3036-PRO-S | FlashFish E200 |
|---|---|---|
| Rated power | 3600 W | 200 W |
| Battery capacity | 3072 Wh | 151 Wh |
| Weight | Not provided | 1,85 kg |
| Mains charging time | Not provided | Not disclosed |
| Maximum solar input power | Not provided | 40 W |
| Number of 230 V sockets | Not provided | 1 sockets |
| Solar | Solar charging compatible | Solar charging compatible |
| Maximum solar input | Not specified | 40 W, XJM connection |
Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, compiled in our reviews. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.
Which is right for you?
GENERGY GZE-3036-PRO-S
Leads on 3 criteria of 3 compared
- Rated power: 9.4/10 vs 6.8/10 (3600 W vs 200 W)
- Battery capacity: 9.2/10 vs 6.6/10 (3072 Wh vs 151 Wh)
- Equipment: 7.5/10 vs 7/10
FlashFish E200
Leads on 0 criterion of 3 compared
- No numerical specification sets it apart in this comparison.
Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →
Frequently asked questions
Which is rated higher, GENERGY GZE-3036-PRO-S or FlashFish E200?
GENERGY GZE-3036-PRO-S scores 8.7/10, compared with 7.2/10 for FlashFish E200, using the same scoring criteria.
Which wins on “Rated power”?
GENERGY GZE-3036-PRO-S wins on “Rated power”: 9.4/10 compared with 6.8/10 for FlashFish E200. Recorded values: 3600 W versus 200 W.
Which wins on “Battery capacity”?
GENERGY GZE-3036-PRO-S wins on “Battery capacity”: 9.2/10 compared with 6.6/10 for FlashFish E200. Recorded values: 3072 Wh versus 151 Wh.
Which wins on “Equipment”?
GENERGY GZE-3036-PRO-S wins on “Equipment”: 7.5/10 compared with 7/10 for FlashFish E200.