Head to head

Anker SOLIX C300X or Kodak S2400M: which should you choose?

Comparison of the two portable power stations using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.

Anker SOLIX C300X, studio product shot

Anker SOLIX C300X

7.7/10
Overall rating

Main drawbackRated output is too limited for an electric kettle

Check price on Amazon → Read the full analysis →
Kodak S2400M, studio product shot

Kodak S2400M

8.6/10
Overall rating

Main drawbackDemanding loads and conversion losses shorten usable runtime

Read the full analysis →

Our verdict based on your priority

  • Priority: “Rated power”Kodak S2400M 8.7 / 10 vs 6.8
  • Priority: “Battery capacity”Kodak S2400M 8.8 / 10 vs 6.8

By criterion

Comparison of Anker SOLIX C300X and Kodak S2400M by criterion
Criterion Anker SOLIX C300X Kodak S2400M
Rated power 6.8 8.7 advantage
Battery capacity 6.8 8.8 advantage
Equipment 8.2 8.2

A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.

Side-by-side specs

Specifications for Anker SOLIX C300X and Kodak S2400M
SpecificationAnker SOLIX C300XKodak S2400M
Rated power300 W2400 W
Battery capacity288 Wh2047,5 Wh
Weight4,13 kgNot provided
Maximum solar input power100 W1200 W
SolarSolar charging compatibleSolar charging compatible
Non-USB DC outputs12 V cigarette lighter socketDC5521 socket
App connectivityWi-FiWi-Fi
ConnectivityWi-Fi and BluetoothWi-Fi and Bluetooth
Battery technologynot specifiedNot disclosed

Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, compiled in our reviews. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.

Which is right for you?

Anker SOLIX C300X

Leads on 0 criterion of 3 compared

  • No numerical specification sets it apart in this comparison.
View Anker SOLIX C300X →

Kodak S2400M

Leads on 2 criteria of 3 compared

  • Battery capacity: 8.8/10 vs 6.8/10 (2047,5 Wh vs 288 Wh)
  • Rated power: 8.7/10 vs 6.8/10 (2400 W vs 300 W)
View Kodak S2400M →
Kodak S2400MNo verified partner offers for this modelRead the full analysis

As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →

Frequently asked questions

Which is rated higher, Anker SOLIX C300X or Kodak S2400M?

Kodak S2400M scores 8.6/10, compared with 7.7/10 for Anker SOLIX C300X, using the same scoring criteria.

Which wins on “Battery capacity”?

Kodak S2400M wins on “Battery capacity”: 8.8/10 compared with 6.8/10 for Anker SOLIX C300X. Recorded values: 2047,5 Wh versus 288 Wh.

Which wins on “Rated power”?

Kodak S2400M wins on “Rated power”: 8.7/10 compared with 6.8/10 for Anker SOLIX C300X. Recorded values: 2400 W versus 300 W.

More useful comparisons

Spotted an error on this page? Report it